Paul Ryan's vice presidential candidacy will certainly bring
on the big-government-small-government debate.
The Republicans have forever said they stand for small government. I have never actually heard the Democrats say
they stand for big government but that's what the Republicans say the Democrats
stand for. Nobody to my knowledge has
really defined what "big" and "small" governments are. Relatively speaking, George W. Bush (a
Republican) inherited a small government from Bill Clinton (a Democrat). When Clinton
left office he handed W a budget surplus of over $600 million. Bush then presided "over the largest
increase in the size of government since the Great Society,” according to Sen.
John McCain (a Republican). Bush then
handed Obama a deficit of over one trillion dollars which most people have
forgotten. With budget samurai Ryan
on the scene, we will now go through all the acrimonious partisan bickering about cutting
this or that (Medicare, defense, Pell grants, education, research, etc,) and
the big-small debate. What I think most Americas
long for is not a big government or a small one. What we really want is a good one, something
we haven't had for over ten years.
No comments:
Post a Comment