Well, once again, the so-called Supreme Court of the United
States of America has shown it is the judicial arm of the Republican
Party. In its latest ruling, Hobby
Lobby, a for-profit corporation can deny women certain contraception coverage
in its employer-provided health plan on “religious grounds.” Let’s not even get into the discussion of
separation of church and state which Republicans ignore when it suits their
purpose, nor the hypocrisy of Republicans’ ranting about government encroaching
on citizens’ private lives (conception would seem to me to be something really
private in peoples’ lives). Let’s just
consider a hypothetical new case brought before the Supreme Court. Let’s say a Muslim family is the single owner
of a privately owned, for-profit manufacturing company that makes toys. It is such a prosperous company that it runs
three shifts round the clock. It employs
15,000 Americans. However, It expects
all employees on all shifts to report for work on December 25 and the
employees, predominantly Christian, file a law suit saying that it is their
most important holiday and they should get the day off. By requiring work on that day, the plaintiffs
contend, their religious freedom is being curtailed. The Muslim family retorts
that based on their “religious grounds” it is not a holiday and they have no
obligation to give Christian employees the day off. Oh, this toy company also prohibits
employees’ bringing ham sandwiches into the building also on “religious
grounds.” Silly isn’t it, but that’s essentially what the Supreme Court did.
Assume an exceptionally good female employee of Hobby Lobby wants to use
contraceptives, specifically one the Hobby Lobby family objects to. She does not share her employer’s religious
beliefs. However, in this instance she
is subjected to the employers beliefs and denied something included in a United
States law (yes, the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act as law)
because of “religious belief.” You can see where I am going. What’s the next thing for-profit corporations
will use “religious grounds” to avoid complying with a law they don’t
like. This, once again, is not a
question of “Democrats waging a war against religion,” as the Republicans are
wont to say. It is a question of the
political right in collaboration with a conservative-loaded Supreme Court endorsing
and imposing Christian religious beliefs on others who not share them.
No comments:
Post a Comment